Berkley EBPHWR Soft Lures Review
Our verdict
The Berkley EBPHWR soft lure sells for $5.99 and holds a 4.4 star rating across 989 reviews, with 500+ bought last month, the strongest demand among the three Berkley soft lures compared here, though it trails the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297's 6,000+ figure by a wide margin.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who want the highest recent demand among Berkley's own soft lure lineup, with 500+ bought last month beating the GMI2-WMPR's 300+ and the GMG-NAT's 400+, at a mid-range $5.99 price point.
Skip if
Skip it if you want the single highest-demand soft lure on the market regardless of brand, since the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297 moves 6,000+ units monthly and rates 4.8 stars, both well above the EBPHWR's 500+ and 4.4 stars.
- Priced 40% below the category median ($9.99 across 65 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.4/5
4.4 average across 989 owner ratings
-
Popularity3.5/5
989 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Restocking a soft lure box between trips usually comes down to two questions: does it catch, and does it sell well enough that other anglers keep buying it. The Berkley EBPHWR is a soft lure priced at $5.99, sitting in the same price bracket as the $5.99 Berkley GMG-NAT and just under the $6.79 Berkley GMI2-WMPR, all from the same brand's soft lure lineup.
Its 4.4 star rating across 989 reviews lands between the GMG-NAT's 4.2 stars from 2,063 reviews and the GMI2-WMPR's 4.6 stars from 197 reviews, a middle position on both satisfaction and sample size within Berkley's own range. None of the three Berkley lures reach the review volume of the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297, which carries 6,300 reviews at 4.8 stars, the strongest rating in this whole group.
Demand is where the EBPHWR pulls ahead of its Berkley stablemates. It moved 500+ units last month, ahead of the GMI2-WMPR's 300+ and the GMG-NAT's 400+, making it the top seller among the three at its price point. The Yamamoto still dwarfs all three Berkley options at 6,000+ units, but within the Berkley lineup itself, the EBPHWR looks like the busiest listing right now.
Pros
- 500+ bought last month is the highest demand figure among the three Berkley soft lures compared here.
- 4.4 star rating across 989 reviews is a large, well-established sample size.
- $5.99 price matches the GMG-NAT and undercuts the $6.79 GMI2-WMPR.
- 989 reviews is nearly five times the GMI2-WMPR's 197 review count.
- InStock availability means it's ready to ship without a wait.
Cons
- 4.4 star rating trails the GMI2-WMPR's 4.6 stars and the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297's 4.8 stars.
- 989 reviews is far behind the Yamamoto's 6,300 and the GMG-NAT's 2,063.
- 500+ bought last month is well under the Yamamoto's 6,000+ figure.
- No detailed specs such as material, weight or color are listed for this particular listing.
Performance notes
As a soft lure priced at $5.99, the Berkley EBPHWR sits at the entry end of this comparison alongside the GMG-NAT, both $5.99, while the GMI2-WMPR runs $6.79 and the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297 tops the group at $7.99. Soft lures in this category typically compete on catch rate reputation built through review volume rather than headline specs, and the EBPHWR's 989 reviews put it in the middle of this group, well short of the Yamamoto's 6,300 but comfortably ahead of the GMI2-WMPR's 197. Beyond price, rating and review count, this listing does not carry additional published specs such as material, weight or color, so buyers comparing exact dimensions or bait style against the GMI2-WMPR or GMG-NAT will need to check the product listing directly rather than relying on a side-by-side spec sheet.
What buyers say
A 4.4 star average across 989 reviews sits comfortably in positive territory, though it lands below the GMI2-WMPR's 4.6 stars and the category-leading Yamamoto's 4.8 stars, suggesting slightly more mixed feedback than those two. Where the EBPHWR stands out is current demand: 500+ bought last month beats both other Berkley listings, the GMI2-WMPR's 300+ and the GMG-NAT's 400+, even though the GMG-NAT has more than double the review count at 2,063. That pattern, moderate reviews paired with the strongest recent sales among its Berkley peers, suggests a listing that is currently a popular pick within its own brand lineup, even if the Yamamoto's 6,000+ figure shows there is a bigger seller in the broader soft lure category.
More from Berkley
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
How does the Berkley EBPHWR compare in price to similar soft lures?
At $5.99, it matches the Berkley GMG-NAT exactly and costs less than the $6.79 Berkley GMI2-WMPR and the $7.99 Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297. It sits at the lower end of this soft lure comparison on price while still posting the strongest recent demand of the three Berkley options.
Is the Berkley EBPHWR a popular soft lure right now?
It shows 500+ bought last month, the highest figure among the three Berkley soft lures in this comparison, ahead of the GMI2-WMPR's 300+ and the GMG-NAT's 400+, though the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297 still leads the wider soft lure category at 6,000+ units sold.
What is the rating on the Berkley EBPHWR soft lure?
It holds a 4.4 star rating across 989 reviews, placing it between the GMG-NAT's 4.2 stars and the GMI2-WMPR's 4.6 stars, and just below the Yamamoto YAM-9-10-297's 4.8 stars, though its review count is much larger than the GMI2-WMPR's 197 total.