350pcs 4334003277 Tool Set Review
Our verdict
The 350pcs fishing tool set costs $8.99 and holds a 4.2 star rating across 32 reviews, the lowest rating and smallest review base of the tool sets compared here. Bought 100 plus times last month, it trails the Fisherman multitool's 500 plus and the Mossy MO23001's 400 plus, making it the budget entry rather than the demand leader.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who need a basic pair of split ring pliers for under $10 and do not require a multi tool with several attachments. High carbon steel construction gives it a functional edge at this price point.
Skip if
Skip it if you want the highest rated option, since the Mossy MO23001 and Fisherman multitool both score 4.6 stars against this one's 4.2. Anglers who want multiple tools in one kit should look at the four piece Booms or Mossy sets instead.
- Material High Carbon Steel
- Color Silver
- Feature Small Fishing Split Rings Pliers
- Priced 59% below the category median ($21.99 across 29 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.2/5
4.2 average across 32 owner ratings
-
Popularity1.0/5
32 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
A snapped split ring at the worst moment is a familiar frustration, and this 350pcs tool set targets that exact fix with a set of small split ring pliers for $8.99. That price sits well below the Booms BFFTFF200040 at $14.99, the Mossy MO23001 at $19.99, and the Fisherman multitool at $36.99, all of which pack in more pieces.
Built from high carbon steel with a silver finish, it is a single function tool rather than a kit, unlike the Booms and Mossy sets, which both ship with 4 pieces covering hook removal and other tasks. The listing does not specify weight, so buyers cannot compare it directly against the Booms kit's 1.14 ounces.
At 4.2 stars across 32 reviews, it trails every alternative in this comparison, including the Booms set's 4.5 stars over 254 reviews and the Mossy MO23001's 4.6 stars over 5,900 reviews. Its 100 plus bought-last-month figure is also the lowest of the group, well behind the Fisherman multitool's 500 plus and the Mossy set's 400 plus. For anglers who specifically need split ring pliers and nothing else, the low price offsets the more modest rating and review base.
Pros
- Priced at $8.99, the cheapest tool set in this comparison by a clear margin.
- Built from high carbon steel for durability on split rings.
- Bought 100 plus times in the past month, confirming ongoing demand despite the low price.
- Simple, focused design as split ring pliers rather than a bulkier multi piece kit.
- Silver finish and compact size suit a tackle box or vest pocket.
Cons
- 4.2 star rating is the lowest among the fishing tool sets compared here.
- Only 32 reviews, far fewer than the Mossy MO23001's 5,900 or the Booms set's 254.
- Single function pliers only, unlike the 4 piece Booms and Mossy kits.
- Bought-last-month figure of 100 plus trails the Fisherman multitool's 500 plus and Mossy's 400 plus.
- No weight specification listed, unlike the Booms kit's 1.14 ounces.
Specifications
| Material | High Carbon Steel |
|---|---|
| Color | Silver |
| Feature | Small Fishing Split Rings Pliers |
Performance notes
High carbon steel construction is the key spec here, since it is the same base material family the Mossy MO23001 lists (carbon steel and stainless steel) for handling the repeated stress of cutting and bending split rings open. This set skips the additional pieces found in the Booms BFFTFF200040 and Mossy MO23001, both 4 piece kits, and the single tool Fisherman multitool, focusing instead on one job. That narrower scope means less to carry and less to lose track of in a tackle bag, but also no backup tool if the pliers alone do not cover a given task like hook removal or scale scraping, which the Fisherman multitool specifically lists as included functions. Silver colored steel construction at $8.99 reads as a straightforward, no frills tool built around a single repeated task rather than a do-it-all kit like the pricier alternatives in this comparison.
What buyers say
A 4.2 star average across 32 reviews is the softest showing among the fishing tool sets in this comparison, trailing the Booms set's 4.5 stars over 254 reviews and the Mossy MO23001's 4.6 stars over an unusually large 5,900 reviews. That gap in both rating and review depth suggests buyers have found more to like in the multi piece kits than in this single function pliers tool. Even so, the 100 plus bought-last-month figure shows the listing keeps selling, just at a lower rate than the Fisherman multitool's 500 plus or the Mossy set's 400 plus. Read together, the pattern points to a low cost, lower profile option that moves steadily on price rather than on standout reviews.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
How does the 350pcs tool set compare in price to other fishing tool sets?
At $8.99, it is the cheapest option in this comparison, undercutting the Booms BFFTFF200040 at $14.99, the Mossy MO23001 at $19.99, and the Fisherman multitool at $36.99. It trades that low price for a single function design rather than a multi piece kit.
What is the 350pcs tool set made of?
It is built from high carbon steel with a silver finish, designed as small split ring pliers. That places it in the same material family as the Mossy MO23001, which lists carbon steel and stainless steel construction, though the Mossy set adds 4 pieces rather than one.
Is the 350pcs tool set well rated?
It holds a 4.2 star rating across 32 reviews, the lowest among the fishing tool sets in this comparison. The Mossy MO23001 scores 4.6 stars over 5,900 reviews and the Booms set scores 4.5 over 254, so buyers wanting the strongest review record may prefer one of those instead.