Foxelli Fox_Ws_10 Waders Review
Our verdict
The Foxelli Fox_Ws_10 chest waders cost $59.97 and hold a 4.4 star average across 3,800 reviews, matching the rating of the cheaper $49.99 TIDEWE pair. Bought-last-month sits at just 50+, well behind TIDEWE's 600+, though still ahead of the FROGG 2713143 at 0+.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who want a camo-patterned nylon wader from a brand with a solid 4.4 star rating across 3,800 reviews, and who are fine paying more than the TIDEWE alternative for that specific camo look and Foxelli fit.
Skip if
Skip it if price is the priority, since the TIDEWE pair matches its 4.4 star rating at $49.99, ten dollars less, and moves 600+ units a month against Foxelli's 50+ bought last month.
- Material Nylon
- Color Camo
- Pieces 1
- Priced 32% below the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.4/5
4.4 average across 3,800 owner ratings
-
Popularity4.7/5
3,800 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Camo pattern matters to a lot of wading anglers who want to blend into the bank rather than stand out in solid brown or forest green, and the Foxelli Fox_Ws_10 delivers that in a nylon chest wader for $59.97. That price sits above the $49.99 TIDEWE nylon pair but well under the $89.15 to $99.99 FROGG neoprene models, putting Foxelli in the middle of this comparison on cost.
On rating, Foxelli holds 4.4 stars across 3,800 reviews, identical to the TIDEWE pair's 4.4 stars over a much larger 13,200 reviews, and ahead of both FROGG models at 4.3 and 4.2 stars. Where Foxelli falls short is recent demand: bought-last-month sits at 50+, the same as the FROGG 2711126-2X and far below TIDEWE's 600+.
Nylon construction keeps the Foxelli pair lighter and quicker-drying than the neoprene FROGG waders, though it will not insulate as well in cold water. For anglers who value the camo finish and a proven 4.4 star rating over the absolute lowest price, the Foxelli pair is a reasonable middle-ground choice, but those focused purely on value or highest current demand should compare it against the TIDEWE pair first.
Pros
- 4.4 star average across 3,800 reviews, matching the higher-volume TIDEWE pair on rating
- Camo finish, a look not offered by the solid forest green FROGG 2713143
- Nylon build at $59.97 costs less than either FROGG neoprene model ($89.15 and $99.99)
- Outranks both FROGG models on star rating, which sit at 4.3 and 4.2 stars
- 1 count listing keeps the purchase simple and single-item
Cons
- Bought-last-month of 50+ is well behind TIDEWE's 600+
- Priced higher than the $49.99 TIDEWE pair
- Nylon material lacks the cold-water insulation of the neoprene FROGG waders
- No weight or size spec listed, unlike the detailed figures given for TIDEWE and FROGG
Specifications
| Material | Nylon |
|---|---|
| Color | Camo |
| Pieces | 1 |
Performance notes
Nylon construction is the throughline across the Foxelli and TIDEWE waders in this comparison, and it trades some cold-water insulation for a lighter pack and faster drying time than the neoprene FROGG models. The camo pattern is a functional choice for anglers working shallow, clear water where a solid brown or green wader can stand out against reeds and brush. At $59.97, Foxelli sits in the middle of this set price-wise, above the $49.99 TIDEWE nylon wader but well under the $89.15 and $99.99 FROGG neoprene pairs. No weight or size figures are listed for this model, which makes it harder to judge pack weight against the 6.2 pound TIDEWE wader or the 9 pound FROGG 2713143, so buyers focused on carry weight may want to check the product listing directly before ordering.
What buyers say
A 4.4 star average across 3,800 reviews is a solid, well-established rating, on par with the TIDEWE pair despite TIDEWE carrying more than three times the review volume. Where the pattern shifts is bought-last-month: Foxelli's 50+ is modest next to TIDEWE's 600+, though it still beats the FROGG 2713143's 0+. That combination, a strong long-run rating paired with lighter current demand, suggests a wader that has built a loyal following over time but is not currently the fastest mover in this camo and nylon segment. Buyers weighing rating against recent popularity should note both signals point in slightly different directions here.
More from Foxelli
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
How does the Foxelli Fox_Ws_10 price compare to other waders?
At $59.97 it costs more than the $49.99 TIDEWE nylon wader but less than the $89.15 and $99.99 FROGG neoprene models, putting it in the middle of this comparison on price alone. That middle position holds up on rating too, since it ties TIDEWE's 4.4 stars.
Is the Foxelli wader well rated?
Yes, it holds a 4.4 star average across 3,800 reviews, equal to the TIDEWE pair's rating and ahead of both FROGG models at 4.3 and 4.2 stars. Its bought-last-month of 50+ is lighter than TIDEWE's 600+, though the rating itself holds steady.
What makes the Foxelli wader different from the others?
Its camo finish sets it apart from the solid forest green FROGG 2713143 in this comparison, making it suited to anglers who want to blend into brushy banks. Nylon construction also keeps it noticeably lighter than either of the neoprene FROGG waders.