AC 63446372 Tackle Bag Review
Our verdict
The AC 63446372 Tackle Bag runs $38.30, the highest price among the compact bags in this lineup, packing a 2.5 liter, 152 cubic inch shell into 12.31 ounces. Its 4.5-star average across 502 reviews is solid, but it trails competitors on both price and review volume, so the appeal comes down to its smaller footprint.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who want a small, lightweight 2.5 liter pouch in Gray/Lime that clips onto a belt or bag rather than a full-size tackle bag, and who don't mind paying more per liter of storage.
Skip if
Skip it if you're comparing on price or purchase volume. The Allen 63366377 and Allnice 8381168 both cost less, carry more capacity, and show far higher review counts and monthly purchase numbers.
- Material Polyester
- Weight 12.31 ounces
- Size 152 CU IN / 2.5 L
- Color Gray/Lime
- Pieces 1.0 Count
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.5/5
4.5 average across 502 owner ratings
-
Popularity3.0/5
502 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Picture needing a small pouch to hold a handful of lures and a spool of leader line for a quick evening trip, not a full tackle box. That's the niche the AC 63446372 fills. At $38.30 it's priced like a bigger bag despite its compact 152 cubic inch, 2.5 liter shell, so the case for buying it rests on wanting that smaller size in the Gray/Lime colorway rather than needing more room.
The specs point to a lightweight, grab-and-go design: 12.31 ounces of polyester construction, a single-piece build, and a footprint measured in liters rather than the inches used for larger bags. That suggests a bag meant to ride in a larger pack or clip onto a belt, not to serve as the main tackle storage for a full day on the water. The 4.5 star rating across 502 reviews suggests buyers are generally satisfied with the fit and finish at this size.
Set next to the field, though, the price stands out. The Allen 63366377 runs $23.80 with 830 reviews and 300+ bought last month, the Allnice 8381168 runs $25.99 with 6,400 reviews and 300+ bought last month, and the Kylebooker KB201803 runs $31.57 with 1,600 reviews. All three undercut the AC 63446372 on price while posting stronger review counts and purchase volume, so anyone not committed to this specific small size has cheaper, more proven options in the same category.
Pros
- Compact 2.5 liter (152 cubic inch) shell weighs just 12.31 ounces for easy carry
- 4.5 star average holds up across 502 reviews
- Single-piece polyester construction keeps the design simple
- Gray/Lime colorway stands out from the olive and khaki tones common in this category
- In stock and ready to ship
Cons
- At $38.30 it costs more than the Allen 63366377 ($23.80), Allnice 8381168 ($25.99), and Kylebooker KB201803 ($31.57)
- 502 reviews is the smallest sample of the four bags compared here
- 100+ bought last month trails the 300+ figures posted by two competitors
- 2.5 liter capacity is modest if you need to carry more than a few lures and spools
Specifications
| Material | Polyester |
|---|---|
| Weight | 12.31 ounces |
| Size | 152 CU IN / 2.5 L |
| Color | Gray/Lime |
| Pieces | 1.0 Count |
Performance notes
A 152 cubic inch, 2.5 liter shell is small by tackle bag standards, more in line with a pouch than a full organizer. At 12.31 ounces, the polyester build is light enough to add to a backpack or sling without noticeable weight, but the tradeoff is limited room, likely a couple of small tray boxes or a handful of loose lures and terminal tackle rather than a full rod-and-reel kit. The single-piece, one-count design means there's no expandable compartment system built in, so what you see in the size spec is what you get for storage. The Gray/Lime color scheme is more visible than the muted olive or khaki finishes typical of this category, a plus for spotting the bag in gear piles or a minus for anyone who prefers a low-profile look on the water.
What buyers say
A 4.5 star average across 502 reviews is a respectable, consistent score, in the same range as the Allen 63366377 (4.6, 830 reviews) and Allnice 8381168 (4.5, 6,400 reviews). What stands out is scale: 502 reviews and 100+ bought last month is a fraction of the volume the Allnice and Allen bags post, and both of those move 300+ units a month. That gap doesn't necessarily mean lower quality, ratings track closely across all four bags, but it does mean fewer people have put this specific size and price through the wringer, so the buying decision leans more on trusting the spec sheet than on a large base of comparable purchase history.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
How much can the AC 63446372 Tackle Bag hold?
Its shell measures 152 cubic inches, or about 2.5 liters, enough for a few small tackle trays, some loose lures, and terminal tackle, but not a full rod-and-reel kit. Anglers needing more room should compare it against larger bags with cubic-inch specs several times higher.
Is the AC 63446372 worth the price compared to cheaper tackle bags?
At $38.30 it costs more than the Allen 63366377 ($23.80), Allnice 8381168 ($25.99), and Kylebooker KB201803 ($31.57), all of which show higher review counts and stronger monthly purchase numbers. It makes sense mainly if the smaller 2.5 liter size and Gray/Lime color are what you specifically want.
What does the 4.5 star rating across 502 reviews indicate?
It shows a consistent, positive reception in line with competing tackle bags, most of which also cluster around 4.5 to 4.6 stars. The lower review count next to rivals with thousands of reviews suggests less purchase volume overall, not necessarily a quality gap.