Unisex UV Protective Fingerless Gloves UPF 50+ Summer Sun Glove Review
Our verdict
The Unisex UV Protective Fingerless Gloves UPF 50+ Summer Sun Glove runs $22.95 and holds a 4.5 star average across 356 reviews. That rating ties the best scores in this glove lineup, though the review count is far behind the 2,607 reviews on the Berkley pair, so the track record is shorter.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who fish long hours in direct sun and want fingerless coverage on the hands and wrists without added bulk, and who are fine paying a mid range price for a dedicated UPF 50+ sun glove instead of a general purpose pair.
Skip if
Skip this if you need cold weather insulation or cut resistance for fillet work, since this is a summer sun glove, not a cold or blade rated glove. Buyers who want the largest review history should look at the Berkley or Lindy gloves instead.
- Priced 53% above the category median ($14.99 across 33 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.5/5
4.5 average across 356 owner ratings
-
Popularity2.6/5
356 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
A day on open water with no shade turns into a sunburned pair of hands fast, and that is the gap this glove is built for. The Unisex UV Protective Fingerless Gloves UPF 50+ Summer Sun Glove is priced at $22.95 and carries a 4.5 star rating across 356 reviews, a score that matches the top end of the fishing glove field.
Against the field, the price sits close to the Glacier 015BK at $23.21, though the Glacier is a neoprene and fleece design built for cold water rather than sun. The Lindy AC950 costs more at $28.35 and is a puncture proof blend glove, while the Berkley BTLCFG undercuts everything at $7.99 with a plastic build meant for fish handling rather than sun protection. None of those three compete directly on UPF coverage.
With 356 reviews, this glove has far less feedback volume than the Berkley pair's 2,607 or the Lindy's 898, but its 4.5 star average shows the reviews it does have skew positive. For a fingerless sun glove specifically, it stands as one of the higher rated options in this comparison set, even without a long sales history behind it.
Pros
- 4.5 star average rating, tied for the top score among the fishing gloves compared here
- Fingerless design meant to keep grip and dexterity while covering the back of the hand
- UPF 50+ rating built specifically for sun exposure rather than cold or cut protection
- Priced under the Lindy AC950's $28.35, giving a lower entry point for a dedicated sun glove
- 356 reviews already logged, enough volume to read as more than a handful of early buyers
Cons
- Review count of 356 is a fraction of the Berkley's 2,607 and the Lindy's 898
- No listed bought-last-month figure above the base tier, so recent demand is hard to read
- No material or weight specs provided beyond the UPF 50+ and fingerless description
- Priced above the Berkley BTLCFG's $7.99, which carries a matching 4.5-plus style rating with far more reviews
Performance notes
A UPF 50+ rating blocks the large majority of ultraviolet rays, which matters most on the back of the hands, an area anglers often forget to cover with sunscreen during a full day on the water. The fingerless cut trades some UV coverage on the fingers for the ability to tie knots, handle line, and grip a rod without pulling the glove off and on. That tradeoff favors anglers who are casting and re-rigging often rather than those doing cold weather work where full finger coverage and insulation matter more. Since this is a summer sun glove, it is not built to handle wet cold the way a neoprene glove would, and it carries no stated cut resistance, so it is not a fillet glove either. It fits a narrow but common use case: long exposed hours on bright water where sunburn, not temperature or blade safety, is the main concern.
What buyers say
A 4.5 star average across 356 reviews suggests buyers who purchased this glove for sun protection are largely getting what the listing promises. That rating matches the higher end of the comparison set, on par with the Berkley and Lindy gloves despite having a much smaller review base. The gap in volume, 356 versus the Berkley's 2,607, points to a newer or lower turnover listing rather than a flawed product, since the rating itself has not slipped as reviews accumulated. With no bought-last-month figure listed above the base tier, recent order volume is not verifiable from the facts here, so the rating and review count are the clearest signal available.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
- AirFly
AirFly Surf Fishing Casting Glove Single Finger - Anti-Slip Finger
$9.95200+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
What does the UPF 50+ rating mean for fishing gloves?
UPF 50+ is a fabric sun protection rating, similar to SPF for skin, and it indicates the material blocks a very high percentage of ultraviolet rays. For a fingerless sun glove like this one, it means the covered parts of the hand and wrist get strong UV protection during long hours on the water.
How does the price compare to other fishing gloves?
At $22.95, this glove costs less than the Lindy AC950 at $28.35 but more than the Glacier 015BK at $23.21 is close in price but built for cold water, and the Berkley BTLCFG at $7.99 is the budget option in this set, though it serves a different fish-handling purpose.
Is this glove a good fit for cold weather fishing?
No. This is a UPF 50+ summer sun glove built for heat and UV exposure, not insulation. Anglers needing cold weather protection should look at a neoprene or fleece design like the Glacier 015BK, which is built for that purpose instead.