BASSDASH Men's IMMERSE Waders Waterproof Breathable Fly Fishing Stocking Foot Review
Our verdict
The BASSDASH Men's IMMERSE waders are priced at $107.98, the most expensive option in this comparison, and carry a 4.3 star rating across 141 reviews. That places it above both FROGG models on stars but well below the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 13,200 reviews, making it a premium priced pick with a comparatively modest track record so far.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Fly anglers who want a neoprene stocking foot wader built for cold water sessions and are willing to pay $107.98, the highest price in this comparison, for a 4.3 star rated option over the cheaper nylon PVC alternatives.
Skip if
Skip it if budget matters more than material. At $107.98 it costs over twice the $49.99 TIDEWE WD001-BN-11, and its 141 reviews are a small fraction of TIDEWE's 13,200, so buyers wanting proven volume should look elsewhere.
- Material Neoprene
- Color Tan/Dun
- Pieces 1
- Priced 22% above the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.3/5
4.3 average across 141 owner ratings
-
Popularity0.8/5
141 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Fly fishing in cold water calls for a wader built from neoprene rather than a thin nylon shell, and that is the case the BASSDASH Men's IMMERSE waders are built around. At $107.98, it is the most expensive wader in this comparison, priced above the $89.15 to $99.99 FROGG models and well past the $44.99 to $49.99 budget picks.
On rating, the IMMERSE holds a 4.3 star average across 141 reviews, which edges out the FROGG 2711126-2X's 4.2 stars and matches the FROGG 2713143's 4.3 stars, though it falls just short of the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 4.4 stars. The 141 review count is modest, well behind the TIDEWE's 13,200 and the FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100, but still a real sample to weigh against the neoprene construction and Tan/Dun colorway.
Bought last month shows 0+, so there is no confirmed recent purchase surge behind this listing the way there is with TIDEWE's 600+. At this price point, the BASSDASH IMMERSE reads as a specialty neoprene option for buyers who value the material over a bigger discount, rather than a volume seller competing on price.
Pros
- 4.3 star rating across 141 reviews, tying the FROGG 2713143 and beating the FROGG 2711126-2X's 4.2 stars
- Neoprene construction, the same material category used on the higher priced FROGG 2713143
- Tan/Dun colorway suited to natural water and streamside settings
- Sold as a single piece with a clear specification
- In stock and available at the listed price
Cons
- $107.98 is the highest price of any wader in this comparison
- 141 reviews is a small sample next to TIDEWE's 13,200 or FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100
- 0+ bought last month shows no confirmed recent purchase volume
- No listed weight or size specs beyond material and color
Specifications
| Material | Neoprene |
|---|---|
| Color | Tan/Dun |
| Pieces | 1 |
Performance notes
Neoprene is a thicker, more insulating material than the nylon and PVC combination used on the cheaper waders in this comparison, which generally means better cold water comfort at the cost of more bulk and weight. The Tan/Dun color leans toward a natural, low visibility look suited to streams and rivers rather than the darker or brighter colors seen on some budget models. Sold as a single piece, the listing does not specify weight, so it cannot be measured directly against the FROGG 2713143's listed 9 pounds, but neoprene waders in general tend to run heavier than nylon PVC builds like the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 6.2 pounds. For anglers prioritizing warmth and material quality over price, that tradeoff is the main thing to weigh here.
What buyers say
A 4.3 star average across 141 reviews puts the BASSDASH IMMERSE in the middle of this comparison on rating, ahead of the FROGG 2711126-2X's 4.2 stars but just behind the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 4.4. The review count of 141 is modest, a small fraction of TIDEWE's 13,200 or the FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100, which means the rating rests on a narrower base of buyer feedback than the more established options. Bought last month is listed at 0+, showing no visible recent purchase surge to reinforce the pattern. Together, this suggests a well regarded but comparatively niche product rather than one with broad, proven demand.
More from BASSDASH
- BASSDASH$109.9850+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
- BASSDASH
BASSDASH FW08 Men’s Breathable Waders Waterproof Fly Fishing Chest Fishing
$109.9850+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is the BASSDASH IMMERSE worth its $107.98 price?
At $107.98 it is the priciest wader in this comparison, and its 4.3 star rating across 141 reviews is solid but not the highest here, that belongs to the $49.99 TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 at 4.4 stars. The extra cost buys neoprene construction rather than a nylon PVC shell.
What is the BASSDASH IMMERSE wader made from?
It is built from neoprene in a Tan/Dun colorway, sold as a single piece. Neoprene is a thicker, more insulating material than the nylon and PVC used in the TIDEWE and Gonex waders in this comparison, generally suited to colder water conditions.
How many reviews back the BASSDASH IMMERSE rating?
The 4.3 star average comes from 141 reviews, a real but modest sample compared to the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 13,200 or the FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100. Bought last month is listed at 0+, so there is no additional signal of current purchase volume beyond the review count.