BASSDASH IMMERSE Women’s Breathable Stocking Foot Fishing Waders Waterproof Lightweight Review
Our verdict
The BASSDASH IMMERSE women's waders cost $110.38 and carry a 4.5-star average across 130 reviews, the highest rating among the waders in this comparison, with 50+ bought last month showing real recent demand. For women anglers who want a breathable, purpose-fit design rather than a unisex chest wader, this is the strongest-rated option here.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Women anglers who want a wader actually cut and sized for a women's fit rather than a unisex model, and who value the highest review rating in this comparison group, 4.5 stars, along with active recent buying activity at 50+ last month.
Skip if
Skip it if budget is the main concern, since at $110.38 this is more expensive than every other wader here except the Simms model. Anglers who need a size other than Medium 8-9 should also confirm fit before buying.
- Material Woven fabric
- Size Medium 8-9
- Color Light Tan/Green
- Pieces 1 Count
- Priced 25% above the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.5/5
4.5 average across 130 owner ratings
-
Popularity0.7/5
130 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Women anglers often end up in unisex chest waders sized for men's proportions, and that mismatch is exactly what the BASSDASH IMMERSE waders are built to fix. Made from a woven fabric rather than nylon, PVC, or neoprene, this pair is sized Medium 8-9 in a light tan and green colorway, and it costs $110.38.
That price is higher than every other wader in this comparison except the Simms model at $449.95, and noticeably more than the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 at $49.99 or either FROGG chest wader. What that higher price buys, based on the listing, is a woven fabric build and a size and fit designed specifically for women rather than a unisex cut.
The 4.5-star average across 130 reviews is the highest rating of any wader in this comparison set, and the 50+ bought last month is a real recent-demand signal, second only to the FROGG 2711126-2X's 50+ figure among the group. The smaller review count, 130 versus the TIDEWE's 13,200, means the sample is thinner, but the combination of a strong rating and active recent purchasing points to a well-liked product among the buyers it has reached so far.
Pros
- Highest rating in this comparison at 4.5 stars across 130 reviews
- 50+ bought last month, among the stronger recent-demand signals in this wader group
- Purpose-built for women's sizing (Medium 8-9) rather than a unisex fit
- Woven fabric construction, a different material approach than the nylon, PVC or neoprene builds elsewhere in this lineup
- In stock and available in a light tan and green colorway
Cons
- At $110.38, more expensive than every wader here except the $449.95 Simms model
- Only 130 reviews on record, a much thinner sample than the TIDEWE's 13,200
- Single size (Medium 8-9) and single color listed, limiting fit options
- More than double the price of the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 at $49.99
Specifications
| Material | Woven fabric |
|---|---|
| Size | Medium 8-9 |
| Color | Light Tan/Green |
| Pieces | 1 Count |
Performance notes
Woven fabric is a less common material choice among these waders, most of which lean on nylon, PVC, or neoprene, and it typically points to a lighter, more packable garment aimed at all-day wear rather than deep cold-water immersion. Paired with a women's-specific size, Medium 8-9, the fit is built around actual women's proportions rather than a scaled-down men's pattern, which should matter more for comfort over a long day than any single spec number. At $110.38, the price sits well above the budget waders in this set and closer to the mid-tier of the category, though still far below the $449.95 Simms model. The light tan and green colorway suggests a design aimed at freshwater and stream fishing rather than open water, where camouflage and lighter tones tend to matter more than in saltwater settings.
What buyers say
A 4.5-star average across 130 reviews is the highest rating among the waders in this comparison, and a 50+ bought-last-month figure shows real, current buying activity rather than a stalled listing. That pairing, a strong rating plus active recent demand, is a healthier pattern than a high rating sitting on old or thin sales, though 130 reviews is still a modest sample next to the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 13,200. The FROGG 2711126-2X is the only other wader here with a matching 50+ bought-last-month figure, but its 4.2-star average trails this product by three tenths of a point. Taken together, the pattern suggests a smaller but currently well-received product rather than an established, high-volume bestseller.
More from BASSDASH
- BASSDASH
BASSDASH FW08 Men’s Breathable Waders Waterproof Fly Fishing Chest Fishing
$109.9850+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
- BASSDASH
BASSDASH FW08 Men’s Breathable Waders Waterproof Fly Fishing Chest Fishing
$109.9850+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is this wader designed specifically for women?
Yes. The BASSDASH IMMERSE is listed as a women's stocking-foot wader in size Medium 8-9, made from a woven fabric rather than the neoprene or nylon-PVC blends used in unisex options elsewhere in this lineup. That women's-specific sizing is the main differentiator from the other waders compared here.
Why does this cost more than most of the other waders here?
At $110.38, it is priced above every wader in this comparison except the $449.95 Simms model. Based on the facts available, that gap likely reflects the woven fabric material and women's-specific sizing rather than any listed feature that the cheaper unisex chest waders lack.
How reliable is the 4.5-star rating given the review count?
At 130 reviews, the sample is smaller than several other waders in this comparison, including the TIDEWE's 13,200, so the rating carries somewhat less statistical weight. Paired with a 50+ bought-last-month figure, though, it does reflect an active and currently well-reviewed product rather than an old or stagnant listing.