FROGG TOGGS Rana II Waterproof PVC Fishing Bootfoot Hip Wader Review
Our verdict
The Frogg Toggs Rana II hip wader sells for $42.55 and has built up 4,500 reviews at a 4.4-star average, the largest review base of any wader in this comparison by a wide margin. With 100+ bought last month, this PVC hip boot is a proven, high-volume choice for anglers who need thigh-high coverage rather than a full chest wader.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers who want a widely bought and reviewed hip wader at a low price, $42.55, with 100+ purchases last month and 4,500 reviews backing up the 4.4-star average. Good for anyone who prioritizes proven track record over premium materials.
Skip if
Skip it if you need chest-high coverage, since this is a hip boot design rather than a full wader. Anglers wanting a lighter woven-fabric or neoprene build should also look elsewhere, since the listed material here is PVC.
- Weight 2.19 Kilograms
- Color Brown Lug Sole
- Pieces 1 Count
- Feature Rana II PVC Hip Boot
- Priced 52% below the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.4/5
4.4 average across 4,500 owner ratings
-
Popularity4.8/5
4,500 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
A pair of hip boots that also work as waders solves a lot of shoreline and marsh problems without the bulk of a full chest suit, and the Frogg Toggs Rana II is built around exactly that idea. It is a PVC bootfoot hip wader with a lug sole, weighing 2.19 kilograms, priced at $42.55.
Among the waders in this comparison, this is tied for the lowest price alongside the GREENWATER chest waders at $55.99 and well below the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 at $49.99 and the two other FROGG chest models at $89.15 and $99.99. The built-in lug sole and one-piece PVC boot design mean there is no separate boot to fit or buy, similar in concept to the GREENWATER chest waders but built for hip-high rather than chest-high coverage.
With a 4.4-star average across 4,500 reviews, the Rana II carries by far the largest review base of any wader in this comparison, more than double the next-closest FROGG model's 2,100 reviews. Bought last month sits at 100+, a clearly stronger recent-demand figure than most of the other waders here. That combination of a high rating, a very large review count, and active recent purchasing points to a well-established, frequently bought product in this category.
Pros
- 4,500 reviews at a 4.4-star average, by far the largest review base of any wader in this comparison
- 100+ bought last month, a strong recent-demand signal
- Priced at $42.55, among the lowest in this wader lineup
- PVC bootfoot construction with a lug sole built in, no separate boot needed
- Weighs 2.19 kilograms, a specific figure buyers can compare against other footwear
Cons
- Hip-boot design only, not chest-high coverage for deeper water
- PVC build rather than neoprene, which may offer less insulation in cold conditions
- Only one color, brown, and one sole type listed
- Rated slightly behind the BASSDASH IMMERSE's 4.5 stars, though on a much larger review base
Specifications
| Weight | 2.19 Kilograms |
|---|---|
| Color | Brown Lug Sole |
| Pieces | 1 Count |
| Feature | Rana II PVC Hip Boot |
Performance notes
PVC is a straightforward, budget-friendly material for a bootfoot design, and pairing it with a built-in lug sole means there is no separate wading boot to buy or fit, similar to how the GREENWATER chest waders in this comparison bundle boots into the wader itself. At 2.19 kilograms, this is a stated weight that buyers can use to judge how much the boots add to overall pack weight compared to unlisted-weight competitors. As a hip design rather than a chest wader, it is built for wading that stays below the thigh, such as stream banks, shallow flats, or marsh edges, rather than deeper water crossings. At $42.55, the price undercuts most chest-wader options in this set, though that lower cost also reflects less coverage rather than a straight discount on comparable protection.
What buyers say
A 4.4-star average across 4,500 reviews is a large sample by any measure in this comparison, roughly double the next-largest count from the FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100 reviews and far ahead of the smaller-count waders like the BASSDASH IMMERSE at 130. With 100+ bought last month, recent demand is clearly active rather than stalled. That mix of high review volume, a strong rating, and current purchase activity is generally the most reassuring pattern available, since a large number of buyers over time have reinforced the same 4.4-star average rather than it resting on a small or recent sample. Only the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 shows a stronger combination overall, with 13,200 reviews and 600+ bought last month.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is this a hip wader or a full chest wader?
It is a hip wader with built-in PVC boots and a lug sole, covering to the thigh rather than the chest. Anglers who need chest-high protection should look at one of the full chest waders in this comparison instead, such as the TIDEWE or FROGG chest models.
How much does this wader weigh?
The listing specifies a weight of 2.19 kilograms for this bootfoot hip wader. That figure includes the built-in PVC boots and lug sole, so it reflects the complete product rather than just the fabric portion, which is useful when comparing pack weight against other waders in this lineup.
Why does this product have so many more reviews than others in this comparison?
The facts here do not explain why, only that it currently shows 4,500 reviews and a 4.4-star average, the highest review count of any wader in this comparison by a wide margin. Combined with 100+ bought last month, it points to sustained, high-volume sales over time rather than a recent spike.