FISHINGSIR Hip Waders, Waterproof Hip Boots for Men & Women, Review
Our verdict
FISHINGSIR's Hip Waders cost $41.99, the lowest price of any wader in this comparison, yet they carry a 4.5-star rating across 344 reviews and 50+ bought last month, a demand signal ahead of two of the three pricier alternatives here that show 0+ recent buyers.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Budget-conscious anglers who want a hip-high wader rather than full chest coverage, and who value the 4.5-star rating and steady 50+ bought-last-month figure over the bigger review counts posted by pricier chest-wader alternatives.
Skip if
Skip it if chest-high coverage is needed for deep wading, hip waders only cover to the hip. Also skip it if review volume matters most, at 344 reviews it trails FROGG's 786 and TIDEWE's 13,200 by a wide margin.
- Color Brown
- Pieces 1 Pack
- Priced 53% below the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.5/5
4.5 average across 344 owner ratings
-
Popularity1.8/5
344 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Not every fishing trip calls for a chest-high wader, sometimes wading to the hip in a shallow creek or along a muddy bank is all that is needed, and that is the gap FISHINGSIR's Hip Waders are built to fill. At $41.99, they are the least expensive option among the waders covered here, undercutting the next-cheapest alternative, TIDEWE's WD001-BN-11, by $8.
They come in brown and ship as a single pack, and the rating stands at 4.5 stars, tying the top score in this comparison. That score is drawn from 344 reviews, a much smaller sample than the 786 to 13,200 posted by the chest-high alternatives, but the bought-last-month figure of 50+ shows steady recent demand, ahead of the 0+ shown by two of the three pricier waders here.
For anglers who only need hip coverage, that combination of a low price, a matching top-tier rating and active recent purchases makes a reasonable case, even without the deep review history of the bigger chest waders. The tradeoff is coverage: a hip wader will not substitute for a chest-high model in deeper water.
Pros
- Cheapest wader in this comparison at $41.99, $8 under TIDEWE's WD001-BN-11 and about $48 under FROGG's 2713143.
- Ties the highest rating in this comparison at 4.5 stars.
- Bought last month shows 50+, ahead of the 0+ posted by two of the three pricier alternatives.
- Hip-high design suits shallower wading without the bulk of a full chest wader.
- Ships as a single pack in a brown colorway.
Cons
- Only 344 reviews, well under FROGG's 786, FROGG's 2,100 and TIDEWE's 13,200.
- Hip-high coverage means it is not a substitute for chest-high waders in deeper water.
- Bought last month of 50+ still trails TIDEWE's WD001-BN-11 at 600+ by a wide margin.
- Only one color, brown, is listed in the specs.
Specifications
| Color | Brown |
|---|---|
| Pieces | 1 Pack |
Performance notes
A hip wader is a different tool than the chest-high models that make up most of this comparison, it is meant for shallower water, muddy banks and creek crossings rather than standing waist- or chest-deep. That narrower use case is likely why FISHINGSIR can price it at $41.99, well under the $89 to $120 range of the neoprene chest waders it is being compared against here. Less material and a simpler design generally mean a lower price, though it also means less protection if water rises above hip level. The brown colorway is a plain, general-purpose choice rather than a camo pattern, fitting a wader meant for everyday creek and bank use rather than concealment-focused hunting. At 4.5 stars across 344 reviews and 50+ bought last month, the numbers suggest steady satisfaction and ongoing demand for a simpler product at a lower price point, even without the review volume of the bigger waders here.
What buyers say
FISHINGSIR's Hip Waders hold a 4.5-star average, tying the highest rating in this comparison, and the bought-last-month figure of 50+ shows active recent demand, matching FROGG's 2711126-2X and beating the 0+ shown by FROGG's 2713143. What is thinner here is the review count: 344 reviews sits well below FROGG's 786, FROGG's 2,100 and especially TIDEWE's 13,200. That combination, a strong rating and steady recent purchases but a smaller total review base, reads like a product still building its long-term track record rather than one with an established history. Given the low $41.99 price and hip-wader category, a smaller overall review pool relative to the pricier chest waders is not unusual, since it likely serves a smaller, more casual segment of buyers.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Are FISHINGSIR Hip Waders as protective as chest waders?
No. They cover only to the hip, unlike the chest-high FROGG and TIDEWE waders in this comparison, so they suit shallower wading like creek crossings and muddy banks rather than standing waist deep or chest deep in water, which needs the fuller coverage of a chest wader.
How does the price compare to other waders?
At $41.99, FISHINGSIR's Hip Waders are the cheapest in this comparison, undercutting TIDEWE's WD001-BN-11 by $8, FROGG's 2713143 by about $47, and FROGG's 2711126-2X by roughly $58. That price gap is notable given the 4.5-star rating matches the best score in the group.
How many people have bought FISHINGSIR Hip Waders recently?
The listing shows 50+ bought in the last month, matching FROGG's 2711126-2X and ahead of the 0+ figures shown by FROGG's 2713143, though still behind TIDEWE's WD001-BN-11, which shows 600+ recent buyers, the highest bought-last-month figure among the four waders in this set.