FROGG 2711636-LG Waders Review

4.6 (319) Amazon rating$115.00

Our verdict

At $115.0, the FROGG 2711636-LG is the most expensive wader in this comparison, but it also carries the highest rating, 4.6 stars across 319 reviews. With 0+ bought last month, that premium price and modest review count suggest a smaller volume listing rather than an established bestseller.

Check price on Amazon

Best for

Anglers willing to pay the highest price in this comparison for the highest rating, 4.6 stars, and who don't need a large existing review base to feel confident, since this listing's 319 reviews is the smallest sample here.

Skip if

Skip this if price is the deciding factor, since the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 costs less than half as much at $49.99, or if you want a wader with a longer track record, since 319 reviews is the thinnest data set here.

  • Priced 30% above the category median ($88.57 across 60 tracked models)

Our scorecard

4.5/5 overall
  • Owner rating4.6/5

    4.6 average across 319 owner ratings

  • Popularity1.6/5

    319 owner reviews, fewer than most models here

The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.

Overview

Some anglers are happy to pay more for a higher rating even with a smaller review count, and the FROGG 2711636-LG at $115.0 is built for exactly that buyer, sitting above every other wader covered in this comparison on price.

No detailed material or weight specs are listed for this ASIN, though the LG in the model name points to a Large size, similar in naming to the FROGG 2711136-LG covered elsewhere in this lineup but priced considerably higher.

The rating picture is strong on paper. A 4.6 star average is the highest of any wader in this comparison, ahead of the 4.4 stars on the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 and the 4.2 to 4.3 stars across the other FROGG listings. But that rating rests on just 319 reviews, far short of the TIDEWE model's 13,200 or even the FROGG 2711126-2X's 2,100. Bought last month sits at 0+, the same weak recent demand signal seen on the FROGG 2713143. Taken together, the 2711636-LG reads as a premium, lightly reviewed option rather than a proven high volume seller, closer in spirit to a boutique pick than an everyday workhorse pair of waders.

Pros

  • Highest rating in this comparison at 4.6 stars
  • Large size, matching demand from buyers who need that fit
  • Listed as in stock and available
  • Rating holds up despite a smaller review sample
  • Distinct FROGG model from the other three FROGG listings compared here

Cons

  • Most expensive wader in this comparison at $115.0
  • Only 319 reviews, the smallest sample of the four waders here
  • 0+ bought last month, tied for the weakest recent demand signal
  • No detailed material or weight specs are listed

Performance notes

Without a listed spec sheet, the 2711636-LG's positioning has to be read through price and rating rather than construction details. At $115.0, it costs noticeably more than any of the other three waders in this comparison, including the next closest FROGG model, the 2711126-2X at $99.99. The LG in the model name suggests a Large fit, consistent with FROGG's naming pattern seen on the 2711136-LG. A 4.6 star rating is a strong signal on its face, but with only 319 reviews behind it, that average is based on a much smaller sample than the thousands of reviews backing the TIDEWE and other FROGG listings, so it carries less statistical weight even though it's numerically the highest score in the set.

What buyers say

A 4.6 star rating is the best in this comparison, but it's built on just 319 reviews, a fraction of the 13,200 behind the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11 or even the 786 behind the FROGG 2713143. Bought last month of 0+ matches the weakest recent demand figure in the set, shared with the 2713143. That combination, a high rating on a thin review base with no signaled current purchase momentum, suggests either a newer listing still building its track record or a lower volume niche product rather than a high turnover bestseller like the TIDEWE model.

Check price on Amazon

More from FROGG

Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider

Featured in

Frequently asked questions

Is the FROGG 2711636-LG's 4.6 star rating reliable?

It's the highest rating in this comparison, but it comes from only 319 reviews, a much smaller sample than the 2,100 to 13,200 reviews behind the other waders compared here. That doesn't make the rating wrong, but it does mean less data supports it.

Why is the FROGG 2711636-LG priced higher than other FROGG waders?

At $115.0, it costs more than the 2711126-2X ($99.99), the 2713143 ($89.15), and the 2711136-LG ($69.99). The facts here don't specify a materials difference, so the higher price likely reflects positioning within FROGG's lineup rather than a stated feature upgrade.

Is this wader currently a strong seller?

Bought last month shows 0+, the same figure as the FROGG 2713143 and the weakest recent demand signal among the four waders in this comparison, well behind the TIDEWE WD001-BN-11's 600+ and the FROGG 2711136-LG's 300+.

Check price on Amazon