Burning 4347353344 Spinning Reel Review
Our verdict
At $66.20, the Burning 4347353344 is priced near the top of this lineup, but its 1,000 reviews average just 4.2 stars, the lowest rating in the entire comparison. Its 1.32-pound aluminum and stainless steel frame is the heaviest and most rust-resistant here, built with a trolling technique tag that points to sustained-drag fishing rather than casting.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Anglers trolling for bigger species in saltwater or brackish conditions who need a heavier, 1.32-pound reel with an anti-rust aluminum and stainless steel build able to withstand repeated saltwater exposure better than lighter freshwater reels.
Skip if
Skip it if you want the highest-rated option available, since its 4.2-star average across 1,000 reviews is the lowest in this comparison, and its 1.32-pound weight is considerably heavier than the lightweight 15-ounce KastKing Sharky III SP 3000.
- Material Aluminum, Stainless Steel
- Weight 1.32 Pounds
- Technique Trolling
- Color Blue- SHA40
- Feature Anti Rust Resistant
- Priced 44% above the category median ($45.98 across 92 tracked models)
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.2/5
4.2 average across 1,000 owner ratings
-
Popularity3.3/5
1,000 owner reviews, more than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other fishing gear and tackle we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
Trolling a bait behind the boat for hours at a stretch puts different demands on a reel than casting all day, and the Burning 4347353344 is built with that job in mind, its Technique field listed simply as Trolling. At $66.20, it's priced close to the JOHNCOO MT200R's $67.99, making it one of the two most expensive reels in this comparison, well above the Shimano SC2500FG's $44.99.
At 1.32 pounds, it's the heaviest reel in this lineup, built from aluminum and stainless steel with an anti-rust resistant feature that suggests brackish or saltwater use where corrosion is a real concern. That extra heft and the stainless steel content trade some hand comfort for durability against the elements, a fair swap for a trolling reel that spends long stretches exposed to spray.
The review pattern is the softest part of the picture. A 4.2-star average across 1,000 reviews is the lowest rating in this entire comparison, and 100-plus units bought last month ties it with the lowest demand figure here as well. Buyers seem to value what it does for trolling, but the broader satisfaction numbers trail every other reel discussed.
Pros
- 1.32-pound aluminum and stainless steel build is the sturdiest, most corrosion-resistant frame in this comparison.
- Anti Rust Resistant feature specifically targets saltwater and brackish-water corrosion.
- Trolling-specific technique tag signals a purpose-built design rather than a generic all-rounder.
- 1,000 reviews is a moderate sample, enough to establish a track record.
- In stock and available to ship.
Cons
- Its 4.2-star average is the lowest rating of any reel in this comparison.
- At $66.20, it's nearly the most expensive reel here, trailing only the JOHNCOO MT200R's $67.99.
- At 1.32 pounds, it's the heaviest reel discussed, adding fatigue on long casting sessions outside of trolling.
- 100-plus units bought last month ties it with the lowest demand figure in this set.
- No listed gear ratio or line capacity to help gauge retrieve speed.
Specifications
| Material | Aluminum, Stainless Steel |
|---|---|
| Weight | 1.32 Pounds |
| Technique | Trolling |
| Color | Blue- SHA40 |
| Feature | Anti Rust Resistant |
Performance notes
At 1.32 pounds, this is the heaviest reel in the comparison, and the combination of aluminum and stainless steel construction explains why. Stainless steel adds weight compared to graphite or carbon composites, but it also resists the corrosion that saltwater and brackish water cause over time, which lines up with the listed Anti Rust Resistant feature. The Trolling technique tag suggests this reel is built to sit under sustained drag pressure for long stretches rather than handle repeated casting and retrieving, a different use case than the Spinning-tagged reels elsewhere in this set. That extra weight and rust resistance come at the cost of comfort on long casting days, but for trolling applications, where the reel mostly sits in a rod holder, the tradeoff makes more sense. Buyers should weigh whether their fishing style matches this specific-purpose design before comparing it directly to general-purpose spinning reels.
What buyers say
A 4.2-star average across 1,000 reviews is the lowest rating in this comparison, sitting noticeably below the 4.6-star marks posted by the KastKing KK-Sharky III SP 3000 and the IX. The 100-plus units bought last month is also the smallest demand figure among the reels discussed here, tied with the JOHNCOO MT200R. That said, 1,000 reviews is still a meaningful sample, not a handful of early adopters, and a 4.2-star average is far from a warning sign on its own. The pattern here reads less like a flawed product and more like a specialty trolling reel with a smaller, more particular buyer base than reels marketed for general casting.
Similar fishing gear and tackle to consider
- DC
DC Baitcasting Reel with Smart Digital Brake, Anti-Backlash Fishing Reel
$45.98200+ bought last monthView on Amazon
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is the Burning 4347353344 good for trolling?
Its Technique field is specifically listed as Trolling, and the 1.32-pound aluminum and stainless steel build with Anti Rust Resistant protection fits that use case, favoring sustained drag durability and corrosion resistance over the lighter weight suited to all-day casting.
Why is the rating lower than other reels in this niche?
At 4.2 stars across 1,000 reviews, it sits below the 4.6-star averages posted by reels like the KastKing KK-Sharky III SP 3000 and the IX. It's still a solid rating on a meaningful sample, just not the top performer among the reels compared here.
Is $66.20 a fair price for this reel?
It's priced close to the most expensive reel in this comparison, the JOHNCOO MT200R at $67.99, and well above budget options like the Blakemore 86 at $15. The price reflects its heavier-duty, corrosion-resistant build rather than a documented performance edge in reviews.